Customer Story · Diageo
How Diageo turns functional experts into enterprise leaders
Two programs, one partner, and a GM pipeline built from inside — 11 internal appointments and counting.
Diageo had a design problem.
The general manager role at Diageo sits unusually high. Joanne Cash, the company's Global Talent Strategy lead, calls it "almost like a CEO for a market or country." A GM owns the P&L, holds authority across functions, and answers to external stakeholders directly. For years Diageo filled those seats mostly with external hires. It wanted to build the pipeline from inside instead, which meant preparing people for that scale of work before they were in the seat.
The program Diageo built to do that is called Horizons.
Horizons
Horizons has many moving parts — coaching, mentoring, peer-network building, and more. But the heart of it, and what everything else orbits, is a customized Capsim business simulation. Diageo's senior leaders teach what GM work actually looks like before it begins; around nine of them score participants against the GM Success Profile — Diageo's internal definition of a strong general manager — while it runs; and it closes with board-style presentations to the leadership team.
The simulation
The rehearsal core — enterprise decisions under pressure, in teams, with consequences.
Before
Capability sessions
Diageo senior leaders teach what GM work actually looks like.
Throughout
Observation
~9 senior leaders score against the GM Success Profile.
The close
Board presentations
Board-style presentations to the leadership team.
The simulation is what makes the others land. Capability sessions can teach participants what the job takes. The simulation is where they have to do it: under pressure, in a team, with consequences that carry forward. That's why Diageo built Horizons around a simulation, and why everything else scaffolds around it rather than the reverse.
Joanne takes the simulation to the next level
Cohort 1 ran on the standard simulation. The feedback was strong but consistent: participants wanted more Diageo context. Around then, Joanne Cash joined as Global Talent Strategy lead and took over Horizons with that feedback in hand. Her question wasn't whether the format worked. It clearly did. It was how far to customize the simulation itself.
She wanted it to feel relevant: close to the decisions a Diageo GM actually faces — market swings, sustainability commitments, brand-reputation calls, tariff shifts. But she didn't want the simulation to be Diageo.
"Operating outside Diageo makes you think broader, bigger, maybe take more risks. But you wouldn't if you felt like it was your company and your environment."
Joanne Cash — Global Talent Strategy, Diageo
So Capsim built custom modules around the decisions Diageo's GMs face but set the simulated company in a different industry. That kept the distance participants needed to take risks they wouldn't take inside their own company.
Inside the room
Inside the simulation, teams run a fictional company across several rounds — each round a simulated year of business decisions, each year's results setting up the next.
Within a single year, it's never one decision at a time. A team weighing a major new-market push has to square the margin math against a sustainability commitment they signed onto two years ago — exactly the kind of brand-reputation tension Diageo built into the sim. Mid-round, the facilitators spring something unscripted — a poaching scene that catches the team off guard, the way a real GM can lose a key person without seeing it coming — and they have to adapt on the spot. Finance is flagging cash. Operations is flagging supply. By the fourth year, the asset-management decisions they made in year one are landing as consequences, and the team has to course-correct with less time than it had at the start.
Joanne describes it directly. "You have to act quickly," she said. "Sometimes there will be crisis or emergencies, demands, questions from an investor, questions from a board member." The simulation also forces participants to lean on each other in ways their day jobs don't always require: "They have to draw on different functional expertise within a team... They have to leverage the skills and capabilities of the team around them."
The pressure is real and the room is loud. Decisions matter, and the consequences pile up round over round. That's the point. Pressure plus accumulating consequence is how Horizons builds the GM-level judgment Diageo is paying for. It's the difference between development that prepares people for the role and the kind that just talks about it.
Same start · diverging outcomes
Observation, mapped to readiness
The observation layer was just as deliberate. Capsim's account lead, Matt Shell, worked with Joanne to map the GM Success Profile onto specific behaviors you could watch for inside the simulation. Senior leaders sat in the room through the rounds, scored what they saw against the Profile, and produced a readiness assessment for each participant at the end.
The data didn't stop being useful when the program ended. It fed directly into Diageo's development planning, coaching decisions, and succession conversations.
Participant readiness · scored against Diageo's GM Success Profile
GM appointments from the Horizons pipeline
of participants moved into more senior roles
Horizons cohorts run to date
Capsim programs now running inside Diageo
Through the first two cohorts.
Diageo's HR Directors say they can recognize a Horizons graduate in a GM interview. As Joanne quotes them: "Whether it's the confidence in how they're interviewing, or how they're thinking and positioning what they would do in the role."
What Joanne found unusual wasn't the outcomes. It was how it felt to work with Capsim.
"It feels like one team. We're all one team here... You couldn't tell who was Diageo or Capsim. It felt more like a deliberate partnership."
Joanne Cash — Global Talent Strategy, Diageo
Three cohorts in, Horizons was working. Well enough that someone else at Diageo took notice.
The second program
In 2026, a different team at Diageo started designing a different program.
Horizons
GM pipeline. Three cohorts. 11 GM appointments and ~60% senior-role progression.
Marketing Leadership Programme
Director-level marketing pipeline. 10 participants. Renewal intent confirmed for cohort 2.
Anna Maliutina, Senior Global HR Business Partner for Global Brand Teams and Consumer Planning, needed something for director-level marketing leaders: high-potential talent heading toward more senior marketing roles, including the eventual CMO seat. The program, the Marketing Leadership Programme, started as a CMO-pipeline accelerator. The cohort already had marketing depth. What they lacked was the cross-functional view and the strategic-responsibility horizon their own function hadn't given them yet.
Anna's team had options. Their colleagues in finance had built a different kind of program, case-based exercises rather than a simulation. But Horizons had a track record inside Diageo. "Horizons was working," Anna said. "The decision was, let's see if the same approach works for us."
The conversation that won Capsim the second program wasn't run by Capsim. It happened between Joanne's program and Anna's team, on the strength of Horizons' three-cohort record.
The shape was different — smaller and shorter, 10 marketing directors over three days with the simulation in the middle. The customization was lighter too: marketing-specific decisions and flavor layered onto the base simulation rather than the heavier custom-module build Horizons got. Diageo's Global CMO, Cristina Diezhandino, and members of the marketing leadership team attended the closing presentation, though it was tuned as an experience-share rather than the high-pressure assessment Horizons runs.
The industry-fit question
Joanne's customization rested on the idea that distance from Diageo's own industry helps. Anna's worry going into the Marketing Leadership Programme was whether a single-function cohort would see it that way. Marketers can be opinionated about whether something "fits" their context. "Going in, our biggest question was: what if the participants say this doesn't fit us?"
Nobody said that. "We had probably worried more than we needed to," Anna said. "What we wanted to learn about those people, we learned regardless."
What the customization surfaced
The customization had a second effect Anna hadn't planned for. The marketing-specific decisions surfaced development insights the cohort's performance reviews hadn't fully captured. A team would propose a brand campaign that fit the brand image perfectly, then have to defend it against the supply-chain implications they hadn't considered, the channel partners they hadn't aligned, and the cash the campaign was about to burn. Marketing instinct meeting cross-functional consequence. "It gave us a reflection on them as marketers, not just as leaders," Anna said.
The partnership, again
What Anna found unusual, like Joanne, was the partnership posture.
"I hardly treat you as providers."
Anna Maliutina — Senior Global HR Business Partner, Diageo
She described what it looked like in the room: how Capsim's team "answered participant questions, gave them problems to work on, and flexed with us in the moments where we needed to shift things around." And what it felt like to trust them as the program ran: "We came in with full trust. The simulation itself is your area of expertise, not ours. Whatever questions people would ask, we knew we had Capsim with us in the room."
Joanne is iterating Horizons cohort by cohort. Anna has confirmed renewal intent for the second Marketing Leadership Programme cohort. The partnership is still in motion.
If you're an L&D leader sizing up a partner, you already know the simulation works; the outcomes settle that. What you don't know is whether the partner will let you build something durable — and then build on top of it.
Diageo answered that by asking Capsim to do it twice.